Skip to main content

Was There a Hint About a Tariff Pause for China Before the Sudden U-Turn

 Was There a Hint About a Tariff Pause for China Before the Sudden U-Turn?

The first week of April unfolded like a geopolitical thriller, with markets reacting wildly to conflicting messages from Washington and Beijing. But amid the chaos, was there a subtle signal—a hint—about a potential tariff pause before the dramatic escalation?

Let’s recap the whirlwind:

  • April 2: The U.S. imposes a 34% tariff on China, sparking global headlines.

  • April 4: China retaliates with its own 34% tariff on U.S. goods.

  • April 7 (Early Hours): News breaks of a 90-day pause on tariffs. Markets soar on the hope of de-escalation.

  • Minutes Later: The White House denies the report, calling it fake news.

  • Later on April 7: President Trump gives China one day to roll back its retaliatory tariffs.

  • April 8: With no response from China, the White House slaps an additional 50% tariff, raising the total to 84%.

  • April 9: China retaliates with an additional 50%, matching the 84% total. (If you wonder why these tariffs end with magical number "4" you can read here)

Then came the surprise twist.

On the same day, the White House released a statement:

"Based on the lack of respect that China has shown to the World’s Markets, I am hereby raising the Tariff charged to China by the United States of America to 125%, effective immediately... 

Conversely, and based on the fact that more than 75 countries have reached out to U.S. representatives and have not retaliated against the U.S., I have authorized a 90-day PAUSE, and a substantially lowered Reciprocal Tariff during this period, of 10%, also effective immediately."

The market soared again.

So, was the early April 7 report—called fake news at the time—actually a leaked hint at what was coming? Was the dramatic back-and-forth part of a strategic dance or a sign of internal disarray?

Either way, this episode highlights the sheer volatility in modern geopolitics and its immediate impact on markets. For investors, traders, and policymakers alike, staying nimble and informed has never been more crucial.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aerospace & Defense Stocks Breakdown: Which Companies Are Worth Investing In?

 If you are looking for US Aerospace & Defense Stocks to invest in then let’s compare Lockheed Martin (LMT), RTX Corporation (RTX), General Dynamics (GD), General Electric (GE), and Boeing (BA) from an investment perspective, focusing on: Core business & products Defense exposure Stability & financial health Growth prospects Valuation and dividends 🔹 1. Lockheed Martin ( LMT ) Core Business : Pure-play defense contractor — fighter jets (F-35), missiles, helicopters (Sikorsky), space systems. Defense Exposure : ~96% of revenue comes from the U.S. Department of Defense and allied governments. Stability : Very stable, heavily backed by multi-year government contracts. Growth : Moderate growth; mostly in line with defense budgets. Dividend : Strong dividend (~2.7%), with decades of increases. Valuation : Often seen as fairly valued or slightly undervalued in uncertain times. Risks : Dependent on U.S. defense budget; limited commercial exposure. ✅ Best for cons...

🚨 When Genius Failed: Lessons from the Collapse of LTCM

In the high-stakes world of Wall Street, few stories are as dramatic—and educational—as the fall of Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM) . When Genius Failed by Roger Lowenstein is not just a finance book—it’s a powerful warning about arrogance, risk, and the illusion of control. Let’s break down what happened, who was involved, and what every investor can learn. 📚 Summary of "When Genius Failed" When Genius Failed chronicles the rise and catastrophic fall of Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM) , a hedge fund that dazzled Wall Street in the 1990s. LTCM was founded by some of the most brilliant financial minds: John Meriwether – Former vice chairman and head of bond trading at Salomon Brothers, known for pioneering arbitrage trading. Myron Scholes – Nobel Prize-winning economist, co-creator of the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Robert C. Merton – Nobel Prize-winning economist, specialized in risk and financial derivatives. Other partners included t...

Is It Time to Buy US Stocks?

 📉 Is It Time to Buy US Stocks? Nobody can perfectly time the market—let’s get that out of the way first. But when your favorite asset is hovering near a major technical support , you need to ask yourself a key question: ❓ If it drops, will you regret buying? Or if it flies, will you regret missing out? If you lean toward the second one, it might be time to pull the trigger . But let’s be clear: Never go all in. Never fully exit. Unless the fundamentals change. 🔍 Why Now? Both $QQQ and $SPY are sitting close to their 200-week SMA —a historically strong support zone. (A 10% drop in SPY would bring it down to its 200-week simple moving average (SMA)) Institutions often accumulate at these levels while retail panic sells. You might be thinking, "This time is different." But I’ve heard that exact phrase during: Market all-time highs Bearish breakdowns Sudden sentiment shifts The truth is: sentiment flips fast. Most investors aren't rational. They...