Skip to main content

Why Do the Tariffs End with "4"?

🧩 Why Do the Tariffs End with “4”?

As all we know the United States has implemented 34% tariff on Chinese imports and in response, China has imposed its own tariffs on U.S. goods, including a 34% tariff on all U.S. imports effective April 10, 2025. ​

And today White House says 104% additional tariffs on China took effect at noon. Collection starts tomorrow.

And more interestingly why these tariff numbers end with magical "4"?

🎯 1. Numerical Symbolism in Chinese Culture

In Chinese culture, the number 4 (四, "sì") is considered unlucky because it sounds very similar to the word for "death" (死, "sǐ").

  • So when tariffs end in 4%, it could be seen as a subtle jab or psychological tactic—especially if done by U.S. policymakers to signal economic "punishment" or a hardline stance.


🧠 2. Calculated Messaging

Governments often use non-verbal cues in trade wars:

  • Numbers

  • Timing (e.g., applying tariffs on national holidays)

  • Product categories (e.g., targeting political base exports like soybeans)

Ending tariffs in 4 could be a way to intentionally provoke or pressure the opposing side—without direct escalation.


🏛️ 3. Game Theory & Escalation

In trade negotiations, strange numbers like 34%,  54% or 104% might signal:

  • “We’re not bluffing”

  • “We’re not done increasing yet”

  • Or, it could simply be stacked layers of previous tariffs (e.g., 10% + 10% + 34%)


📉 Bottom line:

While it could be coincidence, the repeated use of tariffs ending in “4”—especially in U.S.-China dynamics—is very likely a symbolic move, possibly leveraging cultural psychology, and meant to send a message beyond just the numbers.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is It Time to Buy US Stocks?

 📉 Is It Time to Buy US Stocks? Nobody can perfectly time the market—let’s get that out of the way first. But when your favorite asset is hovering near a major technical support , you need to ask yourself a key question: ❓ If it drops, will you regret buying? Or if it flies, will you regret missing out? If you lean toward the second one, it might be time to pull the trigger . But let’s be clear: Never go all in. Never fully exit. Unless the fundamentals change. 🔍 Why Now? Both $QQQ and $SPY are sitting close to their 200-week SMA —a historically strong support zone. (A 10% drop in SPY would bring it down to its 200-week simple moving average (SMA)) Institutions often accumulate at these levels while retail panic sells. You might be thinking, "This time is different." But I’ve heard that exact phrase during: Market all-time highs Bearish breakdowns Sudden sentiment shifts The truth is: sentiment flips fast. Most investors aren't rational. They...

Aerospace & Defense Stocks Breakdown: Which Companies Are Worth Investing In?

 If you are looking for US Aerospace & Defense Stocks to invest in then let’s compare Lockheed Martin (LMT), RTX Corporation (RTX), General Dynamics (GD), General Electric (GE), and Boeing (BA) from an investment perspective, focusing on: Core business & products Defense exposure Stability & financial health Growth prospects Valuation and dividends 🔹 1. Lockheed Martin ( LMT ) Core Business : Pure-play defense contractor — fighter jets (F-35), missiles, helicopters (Sikorsky), space systems. Defense Exposure : ~96% of revenue comes from the U.S. Department of Defense and allied governments. Stability : Very stable, heavily backed by multi-year government contracts. Growth : Moderate growth; mostly in line with defense budgets. Dividend : Strong dividend (~2.7%), with decades of increases. Valuation : Often seen as fairly valued or slightly undervalued in uncertain times. Risks : Dependent on U.S. defense budget; limited commercial exposure. ✅ Best for cons...

Is First Solar ($FSLR) a Good Stock to Buy on the Dip?

Is First Solar ( $FSLR ) a Good Stock to Buy on the Dip? The recent election news has impacted the stock market in interesting ways, particularly in the energy sector. Following Trump’s election to the White House, oil-related companies saw an immediate rally, while green energy stocks like solar were heavily sold off. This could be due to expectations that Trump’s administration will prioritize oil drilling, boosting revenue projections for oil companies while sidelining green energy initiatives. But there’s an intriguing counterpoint worth considering: Elon Musk. The Elon Musk Factor Elon Musk, a prominent figure in renewable energy, played an influential role during Trump’s campaign. Given Musk’s relationship with the incoming administration, it’s reasonable to expect he’ll have some sway on green energy policies. Trump is known for his reciprocal style—rewarding loyalty and partnership. This dynamic could potentially benefit Tesla, SolarCity, and First Solar as a whole, turning wha...